Posts Tagged ‘race’

Ferrari’s New Driving Simulator Generates More Horsepower Than a Small Sedan [Simulators]

December 27th, 2009 | No Comments »

While a majority of those people playing Gran Turismo will never race a Civic, let alone the supercars featured therein, you can bet 100% of the people “playing” Ferrari’s new racing rig will end up on the track some day.

This is because Ferrari’s 200-ton racing simulator is designed to throw as realistic a simulation as possible at the drivers, who will eventually sit behind the wheel of a real, live Formula 1 race car.

The rig is comprised of 10 computers, sporting 60GB of RAM. The hydraulics it uses to simulate motion generate force equal to 174 horsepower—a whopping 34 more than the current Civic I just mentioned in my lame lead-in joke above.

A 180-degree track view is displayed to the driver using five 3D video monitors. Real engine and track sounds are pumped into the cockpit via a 3,500 watt Dolby surround sound system. This thing is unsurprisingly not available to the public and that geeky image at the top of the page is all Ferrari is giving up for now. [Gizmag via DVICE]




More: continued here

Pinch n Pop! (1.3.7)

December 27th, 2009 | No Comments »

Pinch n Pop! (1.3.7)
Chaotic Box
Category:
Price: $1.99
: Eugénie

Application :
“This is an easy recommendation for any arcade fan. Pinch it!” – 148Apps (4.5 out of 5) HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

“By far one of the more original and creative that I’ve run across.” – What’s On (4.5 out of 5)

“Extremely easy to pick up and play, and a lot of fun at that!” – TouchGen (4 out of 5)


Pinch ‘n Pop! is a new breed of frantic free-form color matching fun that challenges both your wits and dexterity. Push, flick, and squeeze the self-replicating Squirms to keep their population under control and maximize your score with color chains and well-timed powerup bursts.


Featured Game! Icon appeared in TV commercials and App Store promotional art!


Features include:

– Unique gameplay with zero-g physics.

– Worldwide internet high score rankings.

– Play casually or strategically to beat the high scores.

– Intuitive multi- controls

★★★★★

Also check out my new game Pollywog!

(2D Physics Dodge’m/Racer)
★★★★★


Visit www.chaoticbox.com for more.

Watch on youtube.com/ChaoticBoxDotCom

Follow me on .com/ChaoticBox

New in this Version:
- Reduced visual shake when nearing the end game sequence

- High score entry cursor now moves forward automatically

- Fixed a text alignment issue in the local high scores

- Fixed occasional OpenAL related crashes when quitting

Full info on Appulous

More: continued here

The Exhaustive Guide to Apple Tablet Rumors [Apple]

December 26th, 2009 | No Comments »

The tablet is almost here. We hear. Actually, we’re hearing a whole lot lately. With this exhaustive guide to every tablet rumor, we’ve got the clearest picture of the tablet yet.

Uh, What’s It Called?

The was called the years before Steve Jobs ever took the stage to announce it. We don’t have the luxury of such clarity here. I would think the name has no more than two syllables, personally.

Overwhelmingly what “evidence” there is points to some form of Slate. Not only did Apple register the domain iSlate.com through an intermediary to keep it a secret, they’ve trademarked it through a shell company called Slate Computing (signed for by ’s Senior Trademark Specialist) and registered domains and trademarks in Europe through their usual IP law firm, utilizing their standard secret trademark practices, last used with the . They’ve also registered “Magic Slate” through the same company. And, while we initially blew off NYT editor Bill Keller referencing an “ Slate” in a speech as meaningless, it’s a whole lot curiouser now.

Borders referenced an “Apple iPAD” in a survey, but it sounds the sad invention of a survey copywriter who hit caps lock instead of shift, not to mention a digital feminine hygiene product. also registered a trademark for TabletMac, but most likely to protect the Mac brand name from modders (it sounds unwieldy and gross).

’s put a lot of effort into iSlate. Is that the name of the Tablet?

When’s It Coming?

Well, obviously everybody who picked a day before today is wrong. Which leaves everyday after today! The overall consensus is that’s being announced in late January—note, though, that a lot of the people part of the new January cabal were the same people convinced it was coming in the fall.

iLounge predicted awfully specifically back in September that “ is currently planning to announce it on or before January 19, 2010.” The Financial Times
said two days ago
that is expected “make a major product announcement on Tuesday, January 26th” at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San Francisco, where ’s rented a stage for “several days.” Silicon Alley Insider says that is going to demo a tablet in January.

But when can you actually hold one? From most to least specific: The Wall Street Journal says the tablet is actually going to ship in March, and an analyst said it’s coming in March or April. iLounge says it’ll hit stores in May or June, like the . Digitimes reported Foxconn is supposed to have almost half a million of ‘em shipped by April. Little emperor of analysts Gene Munster says the first half of 2010. A bunch of connected Mac people just say 2010.

Everybody from the WSJ to fan sites are convinced the tablet is being announced sometime late next month, shipping 2-6 months afterward, so hype and development can be bloom, like the . (Though most of ‘em were wrong three months ago.)

How Much Is It Gonna Cost?

The was $600. Then sales stopped be a-mazing and it dropped to $400. When the came out, it to went to $200 and everybody bought one. So, uh, how much is the tablet gonna be?

Everybody says roughly the same thing: AppleInsider has said it’s “expected to retail for somewhere between the cost of a high-end and ’s most affordable Mac notebook.” Our insider told us it would “cost $700 to $900,” or “more than twice as much as a netbook.” Taiwan Economic Times says it’s between $800 and $1000. China Times, while they got the date pegged to the price horribly wrong, said 800 bucks. And then there’s DigiTimes, who says the whole reason the tablet was “delayed” was because it was getting an OLED upgrade, so it’d be a whopping $1500 to $1700. The final word comes from Steve Jobs who said “we don’t know how to build a sub-$500 computer that is not a piece of junk.”

Survey—and logic—says it’ll be pricier than an and more expensive than a MacBook. Which doesn’t say a lot. If you had to pick a number $800ish seems like the safest bet.

How Big Is It?

The most important spec—and maybe the biggest mystery—is well, how big the tablet is. Three sizes dominate rumors, tied to the size of panels produced by Taiwanese manufacturers: 7 inches, 9.6 (or 9.7) inches, and 10.6 inches.

Let’s go from least to most specific. reportedly told publishers it’s “small enough to carry in a handbag but too big to fit in a pocket.” A company discovered in its traffic logs an “unannounced product with a display somewhere between an and a MacBook,” reported the NYT. The WSJ reported it’s “smaller than its current laptop computers but bigger than the or iPod .”

analyst king of the dweebs Gene Munster, after speaking to “component contacts” in Asia, says it’s between 7 and 10 inches. TechCrunch says it’s 7 or 9 inches. Digitimes says there’s two tablets, one that’s 9.6 inches (with OLED) and another that’s 10.6 inches. Taiwan Economic News says 9.6 inches too. Actually respectable news organization Dow Jones says ordered displays from Wintek that are “between 9.7 and 10 inches.” Oh, and there might be ginormous tablets somewhere out there.

The Financial Times and Reuters both say it’s 10 inches. So does our insider.

iLounge presents a unified theory of the tablet universe that would explain the multiplicity of sizes: There have been three prototypes, and the initial had a 7-inch screen, which was too small, so the latest version is 10.7 inches. Whatever the exact size, they say, it has “7x the touchable surface area.”

Let’s just stick with bigger than an , but smaller MacBook.

What’s Inside

There’s been surprisingly little discussion of the actual specs beyond the size of the screen—storage, memory, processor, etc. Most of the little talk has been about the networking capabilities, actually.

There could be versions with 3G and one without. Specifically, HSDPA maybe (meaning it would only work on AT&T or T-Mobile in the US). Oh look, a SIM card tray, maybe! But maybe it’ll be on Verizon said BusinessWeek. Hey, maybe even Verizon LTE 4G wireless!

As for the processor, Intel Germany CEO passed gas about a bigger “version of the powered by Atom. Dean Takahashi says that the tablet will be the first device using chips that ’s designed in-house by PA Semi, the chip company bought a while ago, and that they’re possibly ARM-based.

Aaaaaannnd it coooooooould have an OLED screen, if it cost 1500 bucks.

A option seems very possible, as does a secret-sauce processor, but who knows?

Who’s Involved?

Um, Steve Jobs, duh. A whole bunch of new multitouch engineers. Oh, and the Newton guy is back.

Quanta might be making it. Or Foxconn (who makes the and got a guy killed over a leaked prototype). With a display made by LG (who makes the gorgeous, if flaky, panel inside the 27-inch iMac.) Or maybe the display’s from Wintek, according to Reuters and Dow Jones. The battery might be made by Dynapack.

Besides , again, who knows?

Patent Soup

The thing about patents is that, besides the fact they’re patenting something, they don’t say a whole lot, at least not about actual products. But here’s a few interesting ones pertaining to a tablet.

This patent for a “display housing for computing device” sure sounds like a tablet, which might fit into the tablet docking station in this patent, and you might use two hands, as shown in this patent to interact a multitouchable OS X, generously illustrated in this patent, unless you use a pen (ha ha ha). And it might be bumpy, in a cool way.

Patents don’t mean a whole lot, so don’t expect any of them to actually make it into a tablet. They could, though.

The Backstory

It’s fairly well known the was born from efforts to develop a touchscreen tablet computer that was simply miniaturized, using tech from FingerWorks, a interface company bought. The NYT reported ’s been working on it since 2003, when they built several prototypes using a battery-slaying PowerPC processor. Our insider said that ’s been working on it for 4-6 years, and that the first prototype of the current version was developed in 2008. Steve Jobs killed the PowerPC tablet, according to the NYT, because Jobs asked what tablets were good for besides web surfing while browsing the web. The WSJ reported he’s killed it twice already.

What’s It Going to Do?

Perhaps the most important question of all: What’s it actually like?

Well, it depends on the OS. OS 3.1 had clear traces of new iProducts, and some people say it’s a bigass iPod touch, or at least running iPhone OS, which sorta fits with app developers supposedly being asked to make higher res versions of their for demonstration. It apparently fits in with the remodeling ’s got going on.

The NYT reported “You will be very surprised how you interact with the new tablet,” whatever that will come to mean. As much as Steve Jobs saying they’ve got some “interesting ideas” about small computers. Martha Stewart is hyped about it, maybe ’cause it has something to do with diners.

Most of the excitement lately is that it’s going to redefine newspapers, books and magazines, which we heard from some publishers, and maybe textbooks, which an insider told us. We’re not the only ones who’ve heard it’s got an ebook bent.

Everybody pre-conceived the based on the iPod and, to a lesser extent, the Newton. Everybody was wrong. Today, most everybody is pre-conceiving the tablet based on the . Maybe we’re all wrong again, or maybe the leaks are better this .

Your Turn

You know our mantra about rumors: Never trust them. But putting all of them together, we’ve definitely got some ideas now.

If there’s any rumor we missed—or you have a tip (we’re good at keeping secret identities)—let us know.




More: continued here

Gas Cubby now available in a free, sponsored version

December 24th, 2009 | No Comments »

Filed under: , , , ,

App Cubby has been producing three wonderful for a while, two of which are associated with keeping tabs on the costs of operating your car. Both Trip Cubby [US$6.99, iTunes Link] and Gas Cubby [US$6.99, iTunes Link] have been lauded by users and bloggers alike for their functionality and usability.

Now there’s one more reason to use Gas Cubby. App Cubby and Honeywell’s consumer auto brands (FRAM, Prestone, and Autolite) have joined together to release Gas Cubby by FRAM [iTunes link], a free sponsored edition of Gas Cubby. According to developer David Barnard of App Cubby, this could be the “first sponsorship deal of it’s kind where an independent developer has partnered with a single company to sponsor a free app.”

Gas Cubby by FRAM will include ads for the Honeywell auto products, and Barnard explained to TUAW why Honeywell decided to partner with App Cubby rather than hire another developer to create their own app.

Continue reading Gas Cubby now available in a free, sponsored version

Gas Cubby now available in a free, sponsored version originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)Gas Cubby now available in a free, sponsored version originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

10 obsolete technologies to kill in 2010

December 24th, 2009 | No Comments »

Some old-and-busted technologies die gracefully of natural causes. Pagers, PDAs, floppy disks — they’re gone, and good riddance.

Add to diggAdd to RedditAdd to SlashdotEmail this ArticleAdd to StumbleUpon

More: continued here

iPhone games review roundup

December 24th, 2009 | No Comments »

Filed under: ,

The big- gamers over at Joystiq have picked up the game review pace lately, and here’s a sampling of what they’ve tried lately.

Thumbnail for iPhone Top Gun game takes highway to the postmortem iPhone Top Gun game takes highway to the postmortem
Top Gun on is one of the device’s many hidden treasures. Not only does it have cool, After Burner-esque gameplay, it’s also got one of the best easter eggs of all (as you can see…
Thumbnail for Ridge Racer: Accelerated comes to iPhone Ridge Racer: Accelerated comes to iPhone
It appears the recently unearthed Ridge Racer: Accelerated trademark pointed to an entry in the long-running racing series. The title is now available on the App Store (try if you’re…
Thumbnail for Battleship now syncing on iPhone Battleship now syncing on iPhone
Adding to its growing roster of Hasbro board retooled for board-less play, EA has christened the / iPod version of Battleship on its maiden voyage to the App Store. The…
Also of interest:

iPhone games review roundup originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)iPhone games review roundup originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

More: continued here

Kamikaze Race

December 23rd, 2009 | No Comments »

More: continued here

Ground Effect 1.1 Released

December 23rd, 2009 | No Comments »

Ground Effect is a silky smooth arcade racer – unique, simple, fast, set on the smoothest and most detailed landscape yet seen on this platform.

More: continued here

Apple Tablet Demo Coming in January; Devs Already Building Apps [Rumor]

December 23rd, 2009 | No Comments »

Silicon Alley Insider has it from a “plugged-in source in the mobile industry” that will demo their tablet in January, and have asked selected devs to prepare high-res for the occasion. So, what exactly is the occasion?

The first possibility—and the one that could put a welcome end to the endless fragments of tablet information that we’ve been parsing for the last few months (fuck that, years)—is that this is some kind of public demo. ’s iPod and events have been dominated by since the App Store opened, sometime to a fault. If ’s going to announce this thing, they’re going to have app .

The second possibility—the more likely one—is that this will be a closed demo; that it’s some kind of private event to give app developers a heads-up before a public announcement, and presumably to comfort them about app interoperability between the and the new tablet device. According to SIA’s source:

[ has] told select developers that as long as they build their to full screen resolution — rather than a fixed 320×480 — their should run just fine

Essentially, it sounds like they’re asking app devs to write quick’n'dirty fixes to remove specific resolution limits from their , so that they can run—though not necessarily gracefully—on a larger screen. That’s the kind of thing that could put developers’ interoperability fears at rest, but not the kind of thing that would want to show the public.

The source claims the device isn’t going on sale until later, which fits nicely with the WSJ’s claim of a March release date, which falls roughly in sync with announcement-but-no-product events of the past. Also, the source claims that the entire Apple tablet concept is a sick prank by Steve Jobs, and that he literally hasn’t stopped laughing for, like, three whole years. [Silicon Alley Insider]




More: continued here

The Best Alternatives to Every Apple Product [Apple]

December 23rd, 2009 | No Comments »

makes some of the most specialized mainstream devices around, but the gear is never very cheap and, let’s face it, it stinks for any one company to own your wallet. So here are the best alternatives for each iProduct:

(If you’d like to see this post in non-gallery form, just click here.)

($199) -> Motorola Droid ($199)
When the was released, it was a generation, at least, beyond the entire smartphone market. Now, many manufacturers have worked hard to catch up. And while the is still my personal favorite, I understand wanting a phone on the Verizon network rather than AT&T. Besides, the Droid hardware is fantastic, and its software, Android 2.0, feels far more like a full-featured OS than the original. Just as we said in our full review, “It’s this simple: If you don’t buy an , buy a Droid.”

What you gain:
• Physical keyboard
• Fewer dropped calls
• Memory slot expansion

What you lose:
integration
• Decent built-in media

iPod Touch ($199, 8GB) -> Zune HD ($219, 16GB)
I know, I know. Why buy a Zune? If you’re heavily invested in albums, the answer is, no reason. But for those who are willing to break from the music infrastructure, the Zune HD is actually an awesome PMP. The aluminum case is very sharp, with an OLED screen that’s richer than any iPod (though slightly worse in the sun). The Zune software, coupled with optional unlimited download subscription packages, is every bit as hip and convenient as Cover Flow and , provided you run Windows. Oh, also, you don’t need to drop $300 to get a decent amount of storage and you get HD TV-Out and a not-so-bad TV interface to boot. So when you’re sick of the little screen, you can go as big as you’d like.

What you gain:
• 8GB more storage (base model)
• HD Radio
• Unlimited music subscription with free MP3s
• HD TV-Out and an on-screen TV interface

What you lose:
integration
• About a billion

iPod Nano ($180, 16GB) -> Flip Ultra HD ($150)
The obvious contender to the iPod Nano used to be the Zune 16. But now? You can’t even get that model of Zune. And with a built-in camcorder, be it a bit on the crappy side, the Nano truly is a unique contender in its space. However, I ask you this: Don’t you already have an MP3 ? Seriously, it’s not possible that you don’t. OK then, just buy the Flip Ultra HD, the best bang for your buck pocket camcorder on the market. And use your old iPod because it probably still works fine.

What you gain:
• HD video

What you lose:
• I mean, it’s not an iPod, or any kind of media , obviously

iPod Shuffle ($80, 4GB) -> Sansa Clip+ ($70, 8GB)
The new Shuffle is basically nonexistent, a device that, while remarkable in terms of minimalist design, may be a tad difficult to wield when you just want to play that one song you want to hear. Enter the Sansa Clip+, an chunky but still tiny MP3 lauded by audiophiles (if such a thing is possible) that supports up to 16GB of MicroSD expansion. Save even more money by buying the 2GB version (just $40) and sticking in a spare MicroSD. And as we said in our review, the Clip+ is “the best low-end mp3 on the market, without question.”

What you gain:
• Sound quality
• MicroSD expansion
• An actual screen
• Voice recorder
• The freedom to choose any headphones

What you lose:

Trash-talking Voice Over function

TV ($229, 160GB) -> Asus O!Play ($99)
No matter what direction you go, you’re pretty much always better off not buying an TV. It’s basically a closed box that hates supporting not only external codecs but external drives, too, and you can forget about navigating to files on your own network—even ones stored on your precious Time Capsule. The $99 Asus O!Play is our favorite budget way to play media in any codec under the sun, from files on a Mac or PC formatted drive or streamed from pretty much any NAS drive. As for watching movies on demand, chances are, your cable box already does that. Need more options? The LG BD390 is an excellent Wi-Fi-equipped Blu-ray with Netflix and Vudu video, and DivX . And heck, I’d even recommend the $199 Xbox 360 as a Netflix/DivX machine with Windows Media Center Extender capabilities. Basically, you can’t go wrong here. Everything is better than TV, unless you have a library full of purchased music and movies, and if you do, you probably have TV already, so go enjoy it.

What you gain:
• Mega codec
• Ability to stream your video files from computers and NAS drives
• Cash in your pocket

What you lose:
• The video ball and chain

MacBook ($999) -> Dell Studio 14z ($750)
As Mark Spoonauer said in our best Windows laptop roundup, “Think of it as the poor man’s MacBook-with better specs.” No, the Dell Studio 14z doesn’t run OS X, but the Core 2 Duo laptop weighs .3lbs lighter than a MacBook while offering 1GB more RAM (base), 70GB more storage, a backlit keyboard and nicer built-in speakers.

What you gain:
• More storage
• More RAM
• Backlit keyboard
• Less weight

What you lose:
• OS X
• Optical drive
• Flash card reader

MacBook Pro ($1200) -> HP Envy ($1700)
I’m not sure anyone should actually choose the 13-inch Envy (full review) over the 13-inch MacBook Pro (full review), but the Envy is the closest knock-off on the market. For the $500 Envy premium, you do shed .8lbs off the MacBook Pro, coming in at just 3.7lbs (which is crazy-light for a laptop of this size). And you’ll score an extra GB of RAM along with a more powerful, discrete Radeon HD 4330 graphics. But we’re still talking about $500 extra for a computer that, ultimately, doesn’t feel as solid as a unibody Mac. Plus, if you really want to run Win 7, that plays just fine on the MBP, too. As for the MBP 15, there’s really no ideal alternative. And if you were considering the 15-inch Envy, think again.

What you gain:
• More overall power
• Less weight
• Prettier screen

What you lose:
• OS X
• Optical drive
• Frame rigidity

iMac ($1200, 21.5-inch) -> HP TouchSmart 600 ($1,050, 23-inch)
The latest iMac (full review) is a beautiful machine, no doubt. But there are alternatives to this famed all-in-one. Our favorite is the HP TouchSmart 600 (full review), which is sort of the souped-up Civic to ’s classic Porsche. Both will do a quarter mile in the same —with Core 2 Duo processors—but the TouchSmart has the shiny detailing and LED underlighting of a street racer, while sprucing up the package with a decent display coupled with special , Facebook and even recipe box designed for the system. Especially as a kitchen computer, the HP TouchSmart is a valid alternative to the iMac.

What you gain:
• Larger, touchscreen
• Glitzy accents with customizable LED underlighting
• Clever
• HDMI input for home theater fun

What you lose:
• OS X
• Understated design

MacBook Air ($1500) -> Dell Adamo XPS ($2000)
There’s only one laptop on the market that can confidently purge alongside the MacBook Air, and that’s the Dell Adamo XPS. While the price premium seems absurd at first, keep in mind that the Adamo XPS, at about half the thickness of the Air, is loaded with a 128GB flash drive and 4GB of RAM stock (while the MacBook Air will run $1800 in a similar SSD configuration and maxed at 2GB of RAM). If you’re considering an Air, you want a computer that says “I’m good at spending money.” And the Adamo XPS will most certainly fulfill that need.

What you gain:
• 1 USB port
• Ethernet jack
• 2GB of RAM
• A clasp that opens from the heat of your finger

What you lose:
• OS X
• About $500

Mac Mini ($600) -> Acer AspireRevo R6310 ($330)
If I had the choice between a Mac Mini (full review) and the AspireRevo R6310—spending someone else’s money—I would still choose the Revo for its HTPC prowess. The Mac Mini has always been a promising system falling just short of its potential in terms of both price and performance. Meanwhile, the absurdly cheap Revo, equipped with Ion tech that’s more than happy to handle 1080p video outputted to your TV through HDMI (as opposed to ’s need for funky wiring and/or hard-to-find specialized adapters), is kind enough to include 2GB RAM, 160GB HDD, HDMI, eSATA, VGA, 6 USB ports, card reader, wireless-N and a wireless keyboard and mouse for roughly half the price of a Mini. The only thing the Revo isn’t optimal for is browsing Flash pages, that is, until we finally see an that makes Ions and Flash play well together.

What you gain:
• HDMI out
• 1 USB port
• eSATA port
• Wireless keyboard and mouse
• Like $300

What you lose:
• OS X
• FireWire

Capsule (1TB, $299) -> D-Link DIR-685 (Expandable, $215)
The convenience of a Capsule, a combination wireless router and NAS, is tough to beat because it’s so unique. But I wouldn’t call the task impossible. The D-Link DIR-685 (full review) is a wireless-N router with a range that’s competitive with ’s own AirPort Extreme. You choose your storage capacity by sticking in your own 2.5-inch drive. Oh, plus it’s a photo frame, BitTorrent downloader, server, FTP server, network file sharing with user management and even a UPnP streamer to video players. The only thing it isn’t? Machine compliant. I know, I know. If you’re willing to part with the built-in router, however, then another excellent choice is the Iomega Ix2-200 NAS (full review)—and that is Machine capable.

What you gain:
• Swappable storage
• Tons of advanced networking features
• BitTorrent downloading
• Media flexibility
• Digital photo frame

What you lose:
Machine (if this is a problem, check out Iomega’s alternative)

Mac Pro ($2,500) -> Hackintosh (far less $$$)
There is one reason you want to buy a Mac Pro, and that’s for OS X. So I’m not going to waste by pretending there’s any suitable alternative by someone like Dell or HP. Your best bet is to build a Hackintosh, a custom PC with a bootlegged OS X. Just keep in mind, you won’t be able to build this system like any old Windows PC—you’ll need to follow a guide with pretested hardware to construct something you can be sure will work. Luckily, such a guide is available, built by our friends from Lifehacker (see it here).

What you gain:
• Literally, thousands of dollars
• Gaudy case mods

What you lose:
• Peace of mind (there’s always the slight chance of Hackintosh deactivation)
• Easy component upgrades




More: continued here